不同进风方式喷雾干燥过程的CFD模拟研究

李翔宇, 杜健军, 樊江莉, 彭孝军

现代化工 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 202 -206.

PDF (2974KB)
现代化工 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 202-206. DOI: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2020.01.043
工业技术

不同进风方式喷雾干燥过程的CFD模拟研究

    李翔宇, 杜健军, 樊江莉, 彭孝军
作者信息 +

Study on effect of different air flow patterns on spray drying process via CFD modeling

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (3044K)

摘要

根据实验室已有的旋流式干燥塔建立模型并按照相同尺寸建立直流干燥塔模型,对比了2种进风方式的干燥效果。模拟结果表明,旋流式干燥塔的干燥效果要好于直流式干燥塔,但也会有黏壁、过热等现象。因此在实验过程中对于高分子物料干燥时应该有关于干燥气体温度及在颗粒干燥塔内的停留时间的特殊操作要求。

Abstract

There are two different drying air patterns with different spray drying towers:direct flow and swirling flow.Different drying air flow patterns have significantly impact on the result of spray drying.Two models with different air flow patterns are built with same size to investigate the effect of air flow pattern on drying effect.The simulation results show that the drying performance of the swirling drying tower is better than that of the direct flow drying tower.But there also exists problems for the swirling drying tower,like sticking walls and overheating.Therefore,in the process of experiment for drying polymer materials,there shall be special operation requirements for drying gas temperature and residence time in the particle drying tower.

关键词

喷雾干燥 / 温度 / 进风方式 / 计算流体力学

Key words

spray drying / temperature / air inlet pattern / computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

Author summay

李翔宇(1994-),男,硕士生

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
不同进风方式喷雾干燥过程的CFD模拟研究[J]. 现代化工, 2020, 40(1): 202-206 DOI:10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2020.01.043

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2974KB)

345

访问

0

被引

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/