Abstract: Through performing test with benchmark solvent (30% monoethanolamine) at the slipstream CO2 capture pilot facility in a power plant,the influence of several key operation conditions such as flue gas flow rate,lean solvent flow rate,regeneration temperature,regeneration pressure on CO2 removal rate and regeneration energy consumption are investigated.Meanwhile the operation conditions for the slipstream facility to achieve a 90% of CO2 capture efficiency and 4.0 GJ/tCO2 of regeneration energy consumption are predicted.The prediction is validated via a continuous 24-hour test with the optimized conditions,which provides a baseline for other solvent assessments on this facility.The successful application of this research approach for slipstream CO2 capture pilot facility has improved the efficiency of pilot-scale testing,and will also supply with valuable experience for larger-scale slipstream CO2 capture demonstrations in the future.
王保登, 崔倩, 闫学良, 张峰, 龙银花, 孙永伟, 熊日华. 燃煤电厂溶剂法碳捕集中试系统分析[J]. 现代化工, 2022, 42(12): 242-246.
WANG Bao-deng, CUI Qian, YAN Xue-liang, ZHANG Feng, LONG Yin-hua, SUN Yong-wei, XIONG Ri-hua. Analysis on slipstream CO2 capture pilot facility at coal fired power plant. Modern Chemical Industry, 2022, 42(12): 242-246.
[1] Net Zero by 2050:A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector[M/OL].International Energy Agency (IEA),https://racetozero.unfccc.int/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector.pdf,May,2021. [2] Gao W,Liang S,Wang R, et al.Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization:State of the art and future challenges[J].Chemical Society Reviews,2020,49(23):8584-8686. [3] Wilson M,Tontiwachwuthikul P,Chakma A, et al.Test results from a CO2 extraction pilot plant at boundary dam coal-fired power station[C]//Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies-6th International Conference.Pergamon,2003:31-36. [4] Mantripragada H C,Zhai H,Rubin E S.Boundary dam or petra nova-which is a better model for CCS energy supply?[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2019,82:59-68. [5] Zhao R,Zhang Y,Zhang S, et al.The full chain demonstration project in China—Status of the CCS development in coal-fired power generation in GuoNeng Jinjie[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2021,110:103432. [6] Wang J,Xu S.CO2 capture RD&D proceedings in China Huaneng Group[J].International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2014,1(1):129-134. [7] 郑学栋,张松涛.燃煤电厂CO2捕集技术与经济分析[J].上海化工,2011,36(5):19-23. [8] Dong Y,Jiang X,Liang Z, et al.Coal power flexibility,energy efficiency and pollutant emissions implications in China:A plant-level analysis based on case units[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2018,134:184-195. [9] Idem R,Wilson M,Tontiwachwuthiku P, et al.Pilot plant studies of the CO2 capture performance of aqueous MEA and mixed MEA/MDEA solvents at the University of Regina CO2 capture technology development plant and the boundary dam CO2 capture demonstration plant[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2006,45(8):2414-2420. [10] Nwaoha C,Tontiwachwuthiku P,Benamor A.A comparative study of novel activated AMP using 1,5-diamino-2-methylpentane vs MEA solution for CO2 capture from gas-fired power plant[J].Fuel,2018,234:1089-1098. [11] Artanto Y,Jansen J,Pearson P, et al.Performance of MEA and amine-blends in the CSIRO PCC pilot plant at Loy Yang Power in Australia[J].Fuel,2012,101:264-275. [12] Brigman N,Shah M I,Falk P O, et al.Results of amine plant operations from 30 wt% and 40 wt% aqueous MEA testing at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad[J].Energy Procedia,2014,63:6012-6022. [13] Tsai P.Variable gauge repeatability and reproducibility study using the analysis of variance method[J].Quality Engineering,1988,1(1):107-115. [14] Arne G,Neils F,Philip L, et al.Pilot scale absorption experiments with carbonic anhydrase-enhanced MDEA-Benchmarking with 30 wt% MEA[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2019,82:69-85.