Please wait a minute...
 
最新公告: 重要提醒:骗子冒充编辑部要求加作者微信,谨防上当!   关于暑假、寒假期间版面费发票及期刊样刊延迟邮寄的通知    
现代化工  2017, Vol. 37 Issue (12): 69-72    DOI: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2017.12.016
  技术进展 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
含铀废水处理技术比选方法研究
汪萍1, 廖运璇1, 孙宏图1,2, 商照荣1, 曲静原2
1. 环境保护部核与辐射安全中心, 北京 100082;
2. 清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院, 北京 100084
Research on comparison and selection of uranium-containing wastewater treatment technologies
WANG Ping1, LIAO Yun-xuan1, SUN Hong-tu1,2, SHANG Zhao-rong1, QU Jing-yuan2
1. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, the Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Beijing 100082, China;
2. Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
下载:  PDF (1325KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 应用层次分析法考虑了技术、经济、环境、公众4个影响因素,建立了含铀废水处理技术比选的层次结构模型。通过分析和讨论,得出合理可行的比选决策结果。结果表明,膜处理法是最优的处理方法,离子交换法次之。这一结果与该厂实际采用的离子交换法和正在实验研究的膜处理法不谋而合,说明AHP方法具有很强的实用性和较好的应用前景。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
汪萍
廖运璇
孙宏图
商照荣
曲静原
关键词:  层次分析法  含铀废水处理  技术比选    
Abstract: Four influencing factors including technology,economy,environment and public are considered by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP),and the hierarchical model for comparing and selecting uranium wastewater treatment technology is established.Through analysis and discussion,the reasonable and feasible comparison decision results are obtained.The result shows that the membrane treatment technology is the best,followed by the ion exchange technology.This result is consistent with the current situation that the ion exchange method is in service and the membrane treatment method is being studied experimentally.It indicates that the AHP method has strong practicability and good application prospect.
Key words:  analytical hierarchy process    uranium-containing wastewater treatment    technology optimization
收稿日期:  2017-10-26                出版日期:  2017-12-20
TL941  
基金资助: 环保公益性行业科研专项(201509074)
通讯作者:  孙宏图(1984-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事核化工与环境保护工作,通讯联系人,010-82205720,sunht07@126.com。    E-mail:  sunht07@126.com
作者简介:  汪萍(1978-),女,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事核化工与环境保护工作,010-82205720,marcy2002@163.com
引用本文:    
汪萍, 廖运璇, 孙宏图, 商照荣, 曲静原. 含铀废水处理技术比选方法研究[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(12): 69-72.
WANG Ping, LIAO Yun-xuan, SUN Hong-tu, SHANG Zhao-rong, QU Jing-yuan. Research on comparison and selection of uranium-containing wastewater treatment technologies. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(12): 69-72.
链接本文:  
http://www.xdhg.com.cn/CN/10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2017.12.016  或          http://www.xdhg.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V37/I12/69
[1] 汪萍,张露,魏国良,等.含氟含铀废水氟化钙共沉淀试验研究[J].现代化工,2016,36(7):138-141.
[2] 万小岗,王东文.四钛酸钾晶须处理含铀废水实验研究[J].环境科学与技术,2007,30(10):67-70.
[3] 汪萍,吕彩霞,盛青,等.含铀废水处理技术的研究进展[J].现代化工,2016,36(12):23-27.
[4] 赵素芬,史梦洁,安小刚,等.零价铁处理含铀废水的试验研究[J].工业水处理,2011,31(7):71-74.
[5] 王建龙,刘海洋.放射性废水的膜处理技术研究进展[J].环境科学学报,2013,31(10):2639-2656.
[6] Saaty T L.The analytical hierarchy process:Planning,priority setting,resource allocation[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1980.
[7] Saaty T L,Vargas L G.Models,Methods,Concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process[M].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2001.
[8] Adriaan J M Goossens,Rob J I Basten.Exploring maintenance policy selection using the analytic hierarchy process;An application for naval ships[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015,142:31-41.
[9] Brian P Reddy,Roisin Adams,Cathal Walsh,et al.Using the analytic hierarchy process to derive health state utilities from ordinal preference data[J].Value in Health,2015,18(6):841-845.
[10] Chen Xingzhang,Chen Hui,You Yong,et al.Susceptibility assessment of debris flows using the analytic hierarchy process method-A case study in Subao river valley,China[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2015,7(4):404-410.
[11] Hadi Veisi,Houman Liaghati,Ali Alipour.Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,60:644-654.
[12] Maria Angélica Petrini,Jansle Vieira Rocha,Christopher J Brown,et al.Using an analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize public policies addressing family farming in Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2016,51:85-94.
[13] 郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(5):148-153.
[14] 李恺.层次分析法在生态环境综合评价中的应用[J].环境科学与技术,2009,32(2):182-185.
[15] 邓琪,王琪,黄启飞,汪群慧.层次分析法评价电石渣资源化利用途径的研究[J].现代化工,2010,30(2):85-90.
[1] 罗振华, 梁泊, 李虎, 胡平, 潘海泽, 贺建, 岑康. 我国页岩气开发环境影响评价模型研究[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(11): 10-16.
[2] 宋昭峥,唐飞,蒋庆哲. 含硫原油加工方案技术、经济和环境综合评价[J]. , 2010, 30(8): 0-0.
[3] 吕保和,雷鑫,朱建军,王晓宁. 在役化工装置安全评价指标体系及评价标准的建立[J]. , 2006, 26(8): 0-0.
[4] 宋昭峥 蒋庆哲 张建广 柯明. 我国清洁汽油生产基地优选评价模型和发展策略[J]. , 2005, 25(8): 0-0.
[5] 张良佺 祝巨. 中国化工产品国际竞争力研究(Ⅱ)——模型的计算和分析[J]. , 2005, 25(2): 0-0.
[6] 张良佺 祝巨. 中国化工产品国际竞争力研究(Ⅰ)——模型的建立[J]. , 2005, 25(1): 0-0.
[1] . [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2015, 35(11): 77 -80 .
[2] . [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2015, 35(12): 128 -130,132 .
[3] . [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(6): 103 -0106,108 .
[4] . [J]. , 2003, 23(5): 0 .
[5] . [J]. , 2009, 29(6): 0 .
[6] . [J]. , 2010, 30(3): 0 .
[7] . [J]. , 2010, 30(7): 0 .
[8] . [J]. , 2007, 27(2): 0 .
[9] . [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2014, 34(2): 131 -133 .
[10] . [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2014, 34(4): 14 -16 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备09035943号-37
版权所有 © 《现代化工》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn